Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Neogene
Paleogene
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Carboniferous
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Cambrian
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic
Paleoproterozoic


Main source = Abduazimova, Z.M. (Ed.), 2001. Stratigraphic Dictionary of Uzbekistan. IMR (Institute of Mineral Resources), Tashkent, 580 pp. (In Russian) Translated to English by the GeoGPT group, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, China--see About

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Aylangar Formation

Aylangar Fm


Period: 
Proterozoic

Age Interval: 
Lower Proterozoic, B1a


Province: 
Bukhara-SW Gissar

Type Locality and Naming

Mount Aylangar, Southwest Gissar. A.V. Pokrovsky in 1967; I.M. Mirkhodzhaev et al., 1977 (307, p.59). Upper formation in Baysuntau Gr

Synonym: Ailyang Arskaya Suite, Айлангарская св., Sarytuz Fm, Sarytuz Suite


Lithology and Thickness

Upper part: amphibole and biotite–amphibole gneisses with interlayers of marbles, quartzites, and amphibole-bearing gneisses.

Lower part of the suite - massive sillimanite-biotite gneisses, non- Banded gneisses with interlayers of quartzite-like biotite, amphibole, and amphibole–biotite gneisses, marbles, quartzites, and amphibole-bearing gneisses.

Total thickness: 1770 m.


Lithology Pattern: 
Gneiss


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

The boundary with the underlying Khodzha-buzbarak Formation is drawn along the base of the granitic gneiss body.

Upper contact

It is gradually overlain by the Shatut Formation

Regional extent

In the Baysuntau Mountains (right bank of the Diymalek River, watershed parts of the Diymalek-Ailyangar and Ailyangar-Shatut rivers, left bank of the Shatut River) and Susyztau (middle course of the Urukly River).


GeoJSON

null

Fossils


Age 

The absolute age of amphibolites of the A. Formation, determined by the potassium–argon method, is 1063 ± 62 million years; garnet amphibolites, 1034 ± 49 million years (350); apo-andesitic tonalite gneisses (from zircons by the alpha lead method), 680 ± 20 and 1200 ± 80 million years; from amphiboles (potassium–argon method), 558–668 million years (307); (rubidium–strontium method), 1386 million years (Askarov, Saigdyganiev, 1985).In rocks that have undergone intense metamorphism, the biostratigraphic method is practically ineffective; paleontological determinations, as a rule, raise doubts and disputes. Therefore, the age of the formation is provisionally assigned to the Early Proterozoic, taking into account radiometric data indicating the time of early metamorphism. A.K. Bukharin and others (122) believe that the available radiometric data for the subdivisions of the Baysuntau Series, including the A. Formation, indicate an older age of the rocks and consider the formation as part of the Lower Paleozoic (Lower Silurian). A.V. Pokrovsky (349) assigns the A. Formation to the Lower Paleozoic based on correlation with metamorphic units of the Surkhantau Range and the northern part of the Baysuntau Range, where acritarchs and microfossils of the Lower–Middle Cambrian were found (92). In Str. el. (442) it is tentatively assigned to the Archean; in the monograph (165) — tentatively assigned to the Archean–Lower Proterozoic. On the State Geological Map of Uzbekistan at 1:500,000 scale (460), it is tentatively assigned to the Lower Proterozoic.

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Tonian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.45

    Beginning date (Ma): 
874.00

    Ending stage: 
Tonian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
0.6

    Ending date (Ma):  
832.00

Depositional setting


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

R.N. Abdullaev, V.V. Mikhaylov – In: GeoGPT translation of: “Abduazimova, Z.M. (Ed.), 2001. Stratigraphic Dictionary of Uzbekistan. IMR (Institute of Mineral Resources), Tashkent, 580 pp. (In Russian)”